Public Policy Update: Some Bills Survived “Crossover” and Some Did Not

NC House Chamber

As I mentioned in my previous blog posting, the week of May 10th to 14th at the General Assembly was crossover,  a “do or die” week for policy bills introduced in the legislative long session. Simplified: bills that pass one chamber, either the NC House or the NC Senate, stay “alive” and can be voted on by the other chamber either this year or next year during the short session, and have the possibility of becoming state law.  Bills which affect the state budget (they require funding or they affect tax revenue) are NOT subject to the crossover deadline and can be considered anytime.  Below is some information about bills that survived and ones that did not which would affect people with autism and other developmental disorders. You can check out a full list of the non-appropriations non-revenue bills that made crossover, as well as the House and Senate rules for crossover in a memo on the NCGA website.

Bills highlighted in green are on the ASNC policy agenda and ASNC is actively working to pass them. Other bills on the list are being monitored because they affect children and adults on the autism spectrum.


[Bills that met the deadline OR affect the state budget and are not subject to crossover]


H 498Autism Health Insurance Coverage –  Read about the autism insurance bill passing the House in our previous blog. The bill is in the Senate Insurance Committee. Write or call your NC general Assembly Senator to ask for their support.  Find out who represents you in the NC Senate by looking at the district map second from the top.


H 269Children with Disabilities Scholarship Grants – This legislation would fund a scholarship program modeled on the existing child with a disability education tax credit, known as H 344. Legislators and advocates expect that the tax credit program will end under proposals for tax reform and have proposed this scholarship program to replace the existing tax credit. Families to apply for a grant of up to $3,000 per semester for children with an Individual Education Plan (IEP) who move from a public school to a private or home school. Students would need to have been in a public school for at least one semester, or have had an IEP in pre-school before entering kindergarten.  The legislation would initially fund about 600 scholarships each year. Legislators and advocates expect that the tax credit program will end under proposals for tax reform. The bill passed the House and is currently in the Senate Education/Higher Education Committee.

H 469 – Education Budget Flexibility – Much of this bill is likely to end up in Senate and House versions of the budget. It would allow local education authorities (school systems) more flexibility in deciding how to use state education funds, including reducing the numbers of teaching assistants. The bill requires schools not to change funding related to special education, but with many students with IEPs now in mainstream classrooms, the reduction of teaching assistants directly impacts the inclusion of students with disabilities in classrooms.  As one advocate put it, “Teaching assistants are not optional for special education students.”

H 587 – Occupational Course of Study/ Extended Course of Study  no ACT – The bill ends the requirement for students enrolled in Occupational Course of Study or Extended Course of Study to take the ACT Test if they do not score at or above on end of grade tests and have parental permission.  Passed the House and currently in Senate Education/Higher education Committee.  ASNC supports the option to remove the requirement for OCS and ECS students to take the ACT.

H 719 – Education Improvement Act – This bill does a number of things, but is mainly focused on changing teacher tenure, new ways to assess teacher performance and assessing school performance. ASNC does not have a position on the bill but is monitoring to make sure that any impact on students with special needs is considered as the bill is debated.  Parents of students with autism have long looked for ways to determine which programs in their district are well performing, and while the bill does not specifically address this, it could be a step towards allowing families to better assess which schools will work for their child.

H 731Vocational Training/Persons with IDD (Study Bill) – This legislation will be rolled into H 718 “Study Issues in Education.” It allows the Education Oversight  Committee to study model programs for people with intellectual disabilities to participate in vocational education, higher education and become more job/career prepared following high school.  This bill is part of our efforts to begin addressing the significant problem of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities being permanently employed by highlighting good programs and policies that have employment as an outcome.

H 838 – Exceptional Children’s Services/ Study – Sets up a Commission to Study the Provision of Exceptional Children’s Services in the North Carolina Public Schools and examines reporting and oversight of exceptional children’s services including student performance assessments, class size, costs to educate students with disabilities and reporting requirements for exceptional children’s services.  The Study bill passed the House and is currently in Senate Rules Committee. ASNC supports looking at Special education and finding ways to improve outcomes for special education students, especially those on the autism spectrum.

S 374 – School Flexibility – while not exactly the same this bill is very similar to H 469 above and provisions of it have been rolled into the Senate’s proposed budget.

S 516  – Public School Regulatory Reform – This bill eliminates some of the required reporting by schools and sets up a study on special education, similar to H 838. The bill has passed the Senate and has been referred to House Education.

School Safety:

H 452 – 2013 School Safety Act – The bill addresses several aspects of school safety including requiring schools to hold safety drills, provide school blueprints/schematics to law enforcement agencies, established a state tip lines, adds school safety to school improvement plans, and allows schools to develop volunteer school safety resource officer programs in conjunction with the sheriff’s department. Schools often do not address students with disabilities in school safety planning, in practice drills and in staff and law enforcement training. Advocates are working to improve the bill to specifically talk about students with disabilities. The bill has passed the House and is in Senate Education/Higher Education.

S 361 – Excellent Schools Act – Since this legislation impacts the budget, it remains alive. Some aspects of the legislation have already been put into the Senate’s version of the budget. The full bill would move student end of grade testing to the final 10 days of the semester, change teacher licensing to require more rigorous standards for continuing to teach, change the performance system for schools to incorporate student performance growth,  remove teacher tenure and allow for more rapid removal of low performing teachers and administrators in low performing schools.

Services, Supports, and Medicaid:

H 867Medicaid County of Residence – Removes outdated requirement for people on Medicaid to remain tied to their original county of residence when they applied for Medicaid.  This county of residence issue is preventing people from accessing services in our statewide Medicaid system. Passage of the bill would mean that CAP/Innovations wavier slots would be portable and people could move to the county of their choosing without losing their services. The bill has passed the House and is in the Senate health committee.

Guardianship Bills

H 543 – MHDDSA Providers as Uncompensated Guardians – Current regulations prohibit providers from serving as guardians of the person since it is generally a conflict of interest. This bill grandfathers in several uncompensated guardians who are providers of mental health, developmental disability and substance abuse (MHDDSA) services whom the court appointed guardianship to when there were no other reasonable options. The bill passed the House and is currently in the Senate Committee on Health. There is also a Senate bill, S 573 MHDDSA Providers/Guardianship Issues that would clarify that MHDDSA providers and Local Management Entities (LMEs) could not be appointed corporate guardians and that caregivers, such as foster families, could be guardians. Because the Senate bill did not make crossover, it seems likely that the House and Senate would combine bill language during the committee hearing process so that all issues would be addressed. 


H 589 – Voter Information Verification Act – This bill would require identification to vote in North Carolina elections.  Disability advocates worked with bill sponsors to make accommodations for voters with disabilities: people can get a free state ID through the DMV and get assistance in getting a birth certificate if you need one (another bill would help home-bound individuals get ID as well), people with disabilities who cannot get into the voting site can vote curbside with state issued ID or other documents, and the ID requirements are phased in over 3 years to allow time for people to get IDs: IDs are not mandatory until 2016. Those over 70 can use expired ID that was valid when they turned 70 and nearly all forms of state issued ID are considered valid for voting. Not all issues that disability advocates raised were addressed, but they continue to advocate as the bill has passed the House and is now in Senate Rules. This significant change in elections law will require much work to outreach to voters on the part of disability advocates and provider groups.

Other Policy News:

Group Home Fix and the Budget: The Senate’s budget bill was introduced and passed last week. ASNC will provide a more detailed overview of the Senate’s proposal in our blog next week. However, it is important to note that the Senate budget does not include funding for a fix for the loss of funds from changes to Personal Care Services under Medicaid. The House and Senate came back in January and almost immediately passed a bill allowing from group homes to be able to access funds set aside for adult care homes.  Senate and House leaders have proposed fixes for Alzheimer’s/Special care units with similar problems, but have yet to do so for group homes for people with developmental disabilities and mental illness. While a pilot program has been proposed, it would only help group homes in 6 counties leaving those in the rest of the state without enough funding to continue to house people with disabilities.  Read more on this issue here.


[Did not pass the crossover deadline, or was voted down. While there are procedures to resurrect bills, including putting them in a study or adding them to a budget special provision, it is very unlikely that these bills are going forward this session or next]

S 646 – Higher Ed Plan for Students with Disabilities – Would have clarified the laws and ensured that community colleges had programs supporting the education of students with disabilities, similar to those in universities. A good proposal, but one requiring addtional funding for community colleges.

S 27 – Public School Protection/ Firearm Amendments (School  Safety Marshals ) –  Many of the ideas from this bill regarding school safety officers have been incorporated into H 452 which is still alive.  See above.

S 59 – Armed Security Guards K-12 – Another bill on school safety and allowing armed security guards. Many questions arose about training and arming school security guards during the session. Some of these ideas were incorporated into H 452 which is still alive. See above.

S 146 – Private Schools Safety – Additional legislation on school safety and allowing for armed staff and volunteers on school property, including private religious institutions attached to schools. Many concepts were incorporated into H 452 which is still alive.

S 633 – No Voting By Those Adjudicated Incompetent – This bill that would have ended voting rights for anyone who was under any kind of guardianship, did not get a committee hearing before crossover and is unlikely to move forward. Guardianship issues are very complicated and more information is needed for legislators to understand the complexities of the reasons someone might be under guardianship, such as having difficulties managing their financial affairs,  (i.e .be considered “incompetent”)  and still be completely capable of exercising their voting rights.

For more information about these or other public policy issues affecting people on the autism spectrum, please contact Jennifer Mahan, Director of Advocacy and Public Policy at the Autism Society of North Carolina Or, you can post your questions in the comments section provided below.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: